Lane IP's ethos is simple: a 3D approach to
IP, a holistic way of looking at our clients' IP
needs, and making sure all angles of their
portfolio are covered.
In the News
• 2013-12-19 - OHIM Update: All time limits expiring between 2 December and 19 December are extended until 20 December 2013 due to the launch of the new website and initial technical difficulties which have now been stabilised
• 2013-12-16 - OHIM Update: The official holidays on which the Office will not be open for the receipt of documents in 2014 shall be the following days: 1 January 2014, 6 January 2014, 19 March 2014, 18 April 2014, 21 April 2014, 1 May 2014, 9 May 2014, 29 May 2014, 9 June 2014, 24 June 2014, 15 August 2014, 9 October 2014, 24 December - 31 December 2014.
• 2013-12-04 - OHIM Update: New Guidelines for Examination in the OHIM on CTM and on Registered Community Designs have been issued
• 2013-12-02 - OHIM Update: On 1 January 2014, the 10th edition of the Nice Classification, version 2014 will enter into force
• 2013-11-26 - OHIM Update: Where a CTM application or application for a registered Community Design contains a representation of the mark which is in colour or contains colour, the original document with the representation of the mark or the design shall be kept on file indefinitely; all other original documents filed and which form the basis of the electronic file shall be disposed of five years after the Office receives them. Revokes Communication No. 8/99 dated 8 November 1999
• 2013-11-26 - OHIM Update: Decision of refusal for CTM applications based on absolute grounds shall be made publically available in the Office case-law database; the database is accessible free of charge
• 2013-11-26 - OHIM Update: The Office has developed a hierarchical structure of goods and services for classification of goods and services referred to as taxonomy.
• 2013-11-15 - OHIM Update: Any time limits expiring between 8 November 2013 and 18 November 2013 for parties residing in, or have a registered office within the territory of the countries affected by Typhoon Haiyan, in particular Philippines and Vietnam are extended until 18 December 2013
• 2013-11-08 - WIPO Update: change in the Amounts of the Individual Fee: Columbia
• 2013-11-07 - WIPO Update: change in the Amounts of the Individual Fee: India
• 2013-11-07 - WIPO Update: change in the Amounts of the Individual Fee: Switzerland
• 2013-09-24 - WIPO Update: Required information when making a payment to WIPO
• 2013-09-10 - Lane IP attend the IJE at Earls Court, London
• 2013-08-07 - OHIM Update: Any time limits expiring on 2 August 2013 are extended until 5 August 2013 due to disruption to electronic communication such as e-business and fax at the Office
• 2013-07-31 - Tunisia become a party to the Madrid Protocol
• 2013-07-23 - ITMA Evening Meeting: 'Case Management in the IPO' by Allan James and Judi Pike, UK IPO.
• 2013-06-25 - WIPO Update: New Layout of Certificates of International Registrations
• 2013-06-25 - WIPO Update: New Statistical Information Available Online
• 2013-06-25 - ITMA Evening Meeting: 'Abuse of process in Trade Mark Litigation' by Michael Edenborough QC, Serle Court
• 2013-06-06 - Lane IP is one year old!
• 2013-05-30 - Rwanda become a party to the Madrid Protocol
• 2013-05-29 - India become a party to the Madrid Protocol
• 2013-04-30 - ITMA Evening Meeting: 'OHIM and IPO Case Update' by Jonathan Moss, Hogarth Chambers
• 2013-04-24 - WIPO Update: Inadmissibility of Requests to Change an International Registration
• 2013-03-07 - ITMA Evening Meeting: 'Recent Developments in U.S. Trademark Practice' by Jim Dimitrijevs, McDonald Hopkins, Cleveland Ohio.
• 2013-02-26 - ITMA Evening Meeting: 'The role of surveys in the IPO, and Court proceedings - a consideration of Interflora' by Jeremey Dickerson, Burges Salmon.
• 2013-01-29 - ITMA Evening Meeting: 'Navigating Legal Professional Privilege for Trade Mark Attorneys' by Dr. Christopher Hayes, Palmyra Chambers.
• 2013-01-23 - WIPO Update: Amendments to Official Madrid Forms (MM Forms)
• 2013-01-23 - WIPO Update: Amendments to Rules 7, 24 and 40 of the Regulations
Brexit – its impact on Trade Marks and Designs in the UK...
This week is a historic week in which Article 50 is triggered signaling the UK’s exit from the EU.
Before we go any further, let’s be clear about one thing: despite some of the comments coming from certain
firms in some other member states, nothing at all will happen for at least 2 years. Nevertheless, we recognize
that our clients want to know what the future holds after Brexit. This is what we know, and can guess, at the
Laos became a Member of the Madrid Protocol as of 7 March 2016.
The Ministry of Commerce & Industry are currently in discussions to make significant changes to the way in which Trade Mark filings are handled and current proposals indicate that official fees are likely to increase by 100%. Details as to when this will take effect have not yet been finalised but notification confirming the same is expected soon.
EU Commission Draft Withdrawal Agreement sets out Proposal for Treatment of EU IP Rights in the UK post-Brexit
On 28 February 2018, the EU Commission published its first draft proposal as to the terms of withdrawal of the UK from the European Union, outlining how existing EU trade marks and designs will be treated vis-a-vis the UK following Brexit.
Although this is a draft document that is yet to be ratified by the UK government or UK Intellectual Property Office, it clearly sets out the EU's preferred stance as to the treatment of IP rights. It will now be sent to the EU parliament Brexit Group before then being transmitted to the UK government and bodies.
UK Court Seeks Guidance from CJEU on Issues of Broad Lists of Goods/Services and Intent to Use on Filing and Impact on Validity of Trade Marks
The UK High Court recently referred some key questions to the CJEU in a trade mark infringement action brought by Sky Plc, the answers to which could have a significant impact on the future filing strategies of brand owners in the EU and UK.
Mr Justice Arnold, acknowledging the 'general public importance' of the issues raised in this case, referred the following questions to the European Court for guidance, firstly on the issue of the clarity of broad terms in goods/services contained in a trade mark registration.
2 Throgmorton Avenue
T: +44 (0) 203 714 9490
F: +44 (0) 207 374 8552